Sunday, July 20, 2014

And there we were thinking that the war against the car was over. All through the Blair years New Labour did its best to demonise the car. The era of Two Wheels Good, Four Wheels Bad. The Congestion Charge (remember how we very nearly had one in Manchester too), draconian parking regulations, carpeting the country with speed cameras, cancelling 100 major road building projects, attempts to charge 4x4s £25 to enter London, speed bumps everywhere, Ken Livingstone famously saying that 'if I had my way I'd ban all cars", the John Prescott Memorial bus lane on the M4 and of course all Alistair Darling's raft of hated fuel duty escalators. Hopefully historians will represent this as a period of rabid anti-car sentiment from the Left. And hopefully they'll see that it wasn't just a hared of cars, but of middle-class people who drive shiny ones. Looking back, I wonder how we let so many left-wing politicians get away with so much thinly-veiled class hatred.


But today I read that The Centre for American Progress, a left-leaning think tank with close links to both Ed Balls and Ed Milliband is calling for fuel duty to be doubled. They want higher fuel duty in the U.S and suggest that European countries should do the same to reduce congestion and pay for transport infrastructure projects. This is so simplistic and child-like its unbelievable. Both the US and UK have long established road economies and only a few major cities have joined up public transport systems. To try and pay through increased fuel duty for a usable, practical and efficient mass transportation system in either country would take decades and cost trillions upon trillions of dollars and pounds. The idea is totally absurd. But think-tanks like this, publishing half-formed thoughts dreamt up by someone in a luke-warm bath, often get surprising amounts of traction. The Blair Government certainly thought reducing road use was a good idea and I worry that both Milliband and Balls are of this persuasion too. Their silence on future road transport strategies is concerning.


The tragedy here is that there clearly are senior politicians who still don't understand that huge swathes of the population entirely depend on cars and vans to survive. To these people mobility is everything and they have no other choice. Public transport simply isn't a viable option for 90% of the population. Yet those same politicians want to take away that freedom of cost effective mobility because they feel its a bad thing. They think those hard-working people create too much pollution and congestion and should be denied the right of cheap movement. And those politicians don't understand that cancelling all those road building projects has caused congestion and pollution and that decades of under-investment in our road system is why things are so bad. Free flowing traffic causes much less pollution than lines of immobile cars all with their engines idling impotently. Its the absence of good sense and well-researched information about road transport in the UK that worries me.

 

The war on the car isn't over yet and we should all be concerned that certain corners of Westminster still haven't seen the light. We at FairFuelUK have done our utmost to control fuel duty and proved the benefits. Does this left-leaning think tank really believe that the uplift in GDP we've created by having cheaper pump prices is a negative? Do they really think that the increased economic activity because of more affordable transport costs should stop? Why aren't they telling us that we should increase investment and usage of low-emission and electric cars. Why aren't they suggesting that the U.S and U.K become world leaders in zero-emission technology? Because they only know one reflexive reaction to car and van use. Make it so expensive that we're all forced to jump on a public transport system that doesn't exist. Like Ken Livingstone, if the Left had its way, they'd ban all cars completely. Sad, but true.



Please donate to help the fight for lower fuel prices and a better deal for drivers


Share this Post:    

ADD YOUR OWN COMMENTS BELOW THIS POST. THEY ARE VERY WELCOME


[ posted by eric zochowski, 20.07.14 16:38 ]

We pay far too much road tax in the first place in this country, and I bet 90% of our road tax goes to the benefit scrounger's of this country. This BS must stop once and for all and the think tank should all be shot as far as I am concerned. We need our car's to go to work because public transport is far too unreliable and far too expensive and far too overcrowded. It is true we have to stop unnessacery trips in our cars and there are far too many car's on our roads, rather increase the price of used cars because they are far too cheap in the first place.
LEAVE THE DAMN FUEL DUTY ALONE you idiote

reply


[ posted by Ryan Spooner, 20.07.14 18:04 ]

This is the opinion of a think tank... this has nothing to do with Labour. This is not, nor ever will be, Labour's policy. Including a picture of ed balls and the Labour logo in this article is cynical anti-Labour propaganda. And to think Quentin, you claim to be apolitical... doesn't seem that way to me.

reply


[ posted by el dingo, 20.07.14 19:04 ]

Er, actually it does have everything to do with the Labour party. It only took me 5 mins to verify this.

reply


[ posted by col, 20.07.14 18:33 ]

It was the conservatives that introduced the duty fuel escalator not Alistair Darling, he just increased the percentage above inflation. Looks more like a conservative party publication as its based on nothing but guesswork and thin air

reply


[ posted by admin, 21.07.14 12:43 ]

Thank you for comment on the FairFuelUK Blog. Let’s be clear the campaign is totally apolitical. If you read the past blogs you will see we have criticised all Parties and have fought the coalition to get lower fuel prices at the pumps. If Labour had been in Government the price of Fuel would have been 20p per litre more, we’d still be in recession, inflation would be more, unemployment would be higher and small business would be going bust. That’s a fact of what Labour planned for the 32 million road users. Our campaign remains apolitical but we will report on issues that go against our core objectives. Please also note one of the many Labour MPs that support FairFuelUK in this blog that you probably have not read. http://www.fairfueluk.com/quentins_blog.php?entry_id=1403014717

reply


[ posted by admin, 21.07.14 12:44 ]

Just stating the report. Thank you for comment on the FairFuelUK Blog. Let’s be clear the campaign is totally apolitical. If you read the past blogs you will see we have criticised all Parties and have fought the coalition to get lower fuel prices at the pumps. If Labour had been in Government the price of Fuel would have been 20p per litre more, we’d still be in recession, inflation would be more, unemployment would be higher and small business would be going bust. That’s a fact of what Labour planned for the 32 million road users. Our campaign remains apolitical but we will report on issues that go against our core objectives. Please also note one of the many Labour MPs that support FairFuelUK in this blog that you probably have not read. http://www.fairfueluk.com/quentins_blog.php?entry_id=1403014717

reply


[ posted by Andrew, 18.08.14 12:55 ]

Labour were and still are a party full of anti-car bigots. they told us they are not AC but their actions through the years told a different story. And to be honest I don't think any of the other liblabcon bunch are any better; I don't know about UKIP either. There seems to be huge efforts from our illustrious politicos to do everything they can for every other country, and for every other person that comes to these shores from other countries, but there is no action for the people that have lived, worked and paid into the system.

We are not getting anything back, and I am getting sick and tired of seeing these benefit scroungers lounging around all day while I get up at 6 every morning, and pay all my [expensive] taxes. I feel like a donkey, maybe I should chuck work and become a druggie and join the slimeballs meeking a living off the working stiffs because they can't be bothered going to work themselves.

reply


your name*

email address*

Add your own comments below this post. They are very welcome*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 



 
RECENT POSTS

 
OLDER POSTS